Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

(Download) "Stephen W. Doss and Stewart Newell, Appellants v. William Tyack and Lindley Murray" by United States Supreme Court " Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Stephen W. Doss and Stewart Newell, Appellants v. William Tyack and Lindley Murray

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Stephen W. Doss and Stewart Newell, Appellants v. William Tyack and Lindley Murray
  • Author : United States Supreme Court
  • Release Date : January 01, 1852
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 83 KB

Description

8. The best reason, perhaps, for setting aside the decree dismissing the bill is, that the Judge erred in listening to the application and granting the order to dismiss it. At the time of the application it had been fully shown by the bill, answers, affidavits, and depositions taken, what the character of the transactions were between Newell and McGreal. In addition to this, the complainants had asked, in the bill, that the property of the firm might be given to the creditors. They had asked for the appointment of a receiver, and prayed that the property might be delivered over to him. They had executed an assignment on their part to the receiver, that he might the better collect the assets. The creditors had paid a consideration for the protection of their interest through this suit. It was too late, therefore, for the complainants to recall what they had done. Hunt v. Rousmanier's Administrators, 5 Cond. Rep. 401. 9. What the complainants had done was equivalent to the execution of a power of attorney, coupled with an interest; and had all the effect of a contract or deed, with a trust ingrafted on the instrument. It was not revocable even by the death of the party. The trust had been created; the trust-fund had been placed in the hands of the receiver under the order of the court; and no imposition on the complainants, nor collusion on their part, should have been permitted by the court to work a devastavit on the property placed in the custody of the court for the benefit of the creditors. The doctrine implied in the language of the court, in the case of Williamson v. Wilson, (1 Bland. 418,) well applies to this case.


Books Free Download "Stephen W. Doss and Stewart Newell, Appellants v. William Tyack and Lindley Murray" PDF ePub Kindle